<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.11 - 25 Sep 2009 - LucMoreau)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 64 to 64

Paolo Missier, yes

Changed:

<
<

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

>
>

Outcome

Result is: yes: 5/abstention: 1.

The proposal is accepted.

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.10 - 23 Sep 2009 - PaoloMissier)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 62 to 62

Joe Futrelle, yes

Added:

>
>

Paolo Missier, yes

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.9 - 23 Sep 2009 - JoeFutrelle)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 43 to 43

Makes sense to me.

Added:

>
>

+

Added:

>
>

Yes, this is a mistake, and using xsd:DateTime will also bring the XML serialization into alignment with most RDF ontologies representing instants in time, for example the "Time Ontology in OWL" W3C working draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-owl-time-20060927/#calclock

Line: 58 to 60

Paul Groth, yes

Added:

>
>

Joe Futrelle, yes

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.8 - 22 Sep 2009 - PaulGroth)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 56 to 56

Simon Miles, yes

Added:

>
>

Paul Groth, yes

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.7 - 22 Sep 2009 - SimonMiles)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 54 to 54

Luc Moreau, yes.

Added:

>
>

Simon Miles, yes

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.6 - 22 Sep 2009 - LucMoreau)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 52 to 52

Jim Myers - abstain

Added:

>
>

Luc Moreau, yes.

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.5 - 17 Sep 2009 - JimMyers)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 50 to 50

Vote

Added:

>
>

Jim Myers - abstain

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.4 - 30 Jul 2009 - SimonMiles)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 39 to 39

Community is invited to provide comments on proposals.

Changed:

<
<

comment 1

>
>

Comment 1 by Simon Miles

Changed:

<
<

include authors

>
>

Makes sense to me.

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.3 - 19 Jun 2009 - LucMoreau)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 55 to 55

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

Added:

>
>

META TOPICMOVED	LucMoreau^?	date="1245396649" from="OPM.ChangeProposalDataTime" to="OPM.ChangeProposalDateTime"

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.2 - 16 Jun 2009 - BenClifford)

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Line: 25 to 25

Proposed solution

Changed:

<
<

it should be an xs:dateTime ?

>
>

it should be an xs:dateTime

Rationale for the solution

Changed:

<
<

>
>

The intent from the OPM spec appears (clearly?) to be a non-repeating time specified over all of eternity. The use of xsd:time appears to be a mistake in the XSD schema.

Line: 54 to 54

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

Deleted:

<
<

> time represents an instant of time that recurs every day.

That seems wrong.

Perhaps it should be an xs:dateTime ?

<<O>> Difference Topic ChangeProposalDateTime (r1.1 - 15 Jun 2009 - LucMoreau)

Line: 1 to 1

Added:

>
>

META TOPICPARENT	WorkInProgressV1pt1

Change Proposal: Date Time in XML Schema

Authors

Ben Clifford

Subject

XML schema http://openprovenance.org/model/v1.01.a

Background

Definition of time in Time annotations does not seem correct.

Problem addressed

xs:time represents an instant of time that recurs every day.

Proposed solution

it should be an xs:dateTime ?

Rationale for the solution

Comments

Community is invited to provide comments on proposals.

comment 1

include authors

Vote

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009

-- LucMoreau - 15 Jun 2009 > time represents an instant of time that recurs every day.

That seems wrong.

Perhaps it should be an xs:dateTime ?